DexMetal

Amendments History and Future Changes

← Back to Additional Reference Content

The Basel Convention evolves through amendments adopted by the Conference of Parties. Understanding past amendments, their implementation status, and future proposed changes helps exporters anticipate regulatory shifts and adapt operations accordingly. This page chronicles major Basel amendments, tracks their entry into force, and identifies emerging issues that may lead to future changes affecting e-waste trade.

How Basel Amendments Work

AMENDMENT PROCESS:

  • Conference of Parties (COP) meets biennially
  • Parties propose amendments to Convention text or annexes
  • COP debates and votes on proposed amendments
  • Adoption requires three-fourths majority of Parties present and voting
  • Amendment enters into force after specified number of ratifications
  • Only binding on Parties that ratify (unless otherwise specified)

TYPES OF AMENDMENTS:

  • Convention Text: Changes to articles (rare, requires high threshold)
  • Annexes: Changes to waste lists, procedures, forms (more common)
  • Technical Guidelines: COP decisions providing guidance (not formally amendments but practically important)
  • Decisions: Interpretations and clarifications by COP

TRACKING AMENDMENT STATUS:

  • Basel Secretariat maintains official status of amendments
  • Check which countries have ratified each amendment
  • Entry into force date determines when obligations begin
  • Some amendments not yet in force due to insufficient ratifications
  • Practical impact may precede formal entry into force (countries implement early)

Major Historical Amendments

BAN AMENDMENT (1995, ENTERED INTO FORCE 2019):

Background:

  • Adopted at COP-3 in September 1995
  • Controversial amendment with 25-year path to entry into force
  • Finally entered into force December 5, 2019 after 97th ratification
  • Not ratified by all Parties (notably US cannot ratify as non-Party)

Provisions:

  • Prohibits export of hazardous wastes from Annex VII countries (OECD, EU, Liechtenstein) to non-Annex VII countries
  • Applies to wastes intended for final disposal AND recovery operations
  • Effectively ends North-South hazardous waste trade for ratifying countries
  • Exceptions extremely limited

Impact on E-Waste:

  • OECD countries that ratified cannot export hazardous e-waste to non-OECD countries
  • Major shift for European exporters who previously sent to Asia, Africa, Latin America
  • Accelerated development of domestic OECD recycling capacity
  • Increased scrutiny of "used equipment" vs. "waste" distinction
  • EU 2026 regulations implement Ban Amendment proactively

Current Status:

  • In force for 98 Parties (as of 2024)
  • Check specific country ratification status before assuming applicability
  • Some major waste trading nations have not ratified
  • Practically, many countries implementing even without ratification

ANNEXES VIII AND IX AMENDMENT (1998, ENTERED INTO FORCE 2000):

Background:

  • Adopted at COP-4 in 1998
  • Created lists of wastes categorically hazardous (Annex VIII) vs. not covered by Article 1(1)(a) (Annex IX)
  • Entered into force May 6, 2000

Provisions:

  • Annex VIII: Wastes characterized as hazardous (A-codes)
  • Annex IX: Wastes not covered by Article 1(1)(a) unless contaminated (B-codes)
  • Shifted from case-by-case determination to categorical listings
  • Reduced ambiguity in waste classification

E-Waste Entries:

  • Annex VIII A1180: Waste electrical and electronic assemblies (later replaced by A1181)
  • Annex IX B1110: Electrical and electronic assemblies (later deleted in 2025)
  • Created framework for e-waste classification still used today

PROTOCOL ON LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION (1999, NOT YET IN FORCE):

Background:

  • Adopted at COP-5 in 1999
  • Requires 20 ratifications to enter into force
  • As of 2024, only 13 ratifications—not yet in force
  • Uncertain if will ever enter into force

Provisions:

  • Establishes liability regime for damage from hazardous waste movements
  • Strict liability (no fault required) on notifier
  • Fault-based liability on others in chain of custody
  • Financial limits and insurance requirements
  • Compensation fund for cases where liable party cannot pay

Practical Impact (even without entry into force):

  • Many countries require financial guarantees inspired by Protocol
  • Insurance industry developed products based on Protocol framework
  • Risk management practices reflect Protocol concepts

2025 E-Waste Amendments (Recent)

BACKGROUND:

  • COP-15 in 2023 debated e-waste amendments
  • Entered into force January 1, 2025 for early ratifiers
  • Addresses modern electronics and recycling practices
  • Responds to growth in e-waste generation and trade

Y49 ADDITION (ANNEX I):

  • New Y-code specifically for electronic waste
  • Y49: "Electronic waste (e.g., discarded television sets, computers, mobile phones)"
  • Covers e-waste not exhibiting Annex III hazardous characteristics
  • Brings non-hazardous e-waste under Basel controls
  • Prevents classification loophole where functional equipment vs. waste distinction exploited

SeeY49 Non-Hazardous E-Waste Classificationfor detailed guidance.

A1181 MODIFICATION (ANNEX VIII):

  • Replaces A1180 with more specific entry
  • A1181: "Electronic waste (e.g., discarded television sets, computers, mobile phones) and e-scrap (e.g., printed circuit boards) containing or contaminated with Annex I constituents to an extent that they exhibit Annex III characteristics"
  • Clarifies hazardous e-waste definition
  • Modernizes language from "assemblies" to "electronic waste"
  • Links explicitly to Annex I constituents and Annex III characteristics

SeeA1181 Hazardous E-Waste Classificationfor detailed guidance.

B1110 AND B4030 DELETION (ANNEX IX):

  • B1110 (electrical and electronic assemblies) deleted
  • B4030 (glass waste) deleted for electronic glass
  • Eliminates confusion where items claimed as "non-hazardous" B-codes
  • Forces proper hazard assessment rather than default to B-list
  • Materials previously under B1110 now classified as Y49 (if non-hazardous) or A1181 (if hazardous)

PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION:

  • Exporters must reclassify waste streams using Y49 and A1181
  • Notifications submitted before 2025 with B1110 need updating
  • Competent authorities adjusting approval templates
  • Transitional period with both old and new codes in use
  • By 2026, full adoption expected

Plastic Waste Amendments (2019, Entering Force 2021)

BACKGROUND:

  • Adopted at COP-14 in 2019
  • Entered into force January 1, 2021
  • Response to global plastic waste crisis
  • Addresses plastic components in e-waste

AMENDMENTS:

  • New Annex II and IX entries for plastic wastes
  • Contaminated plastic waste classified as hazardous
  • Mixed plastic waste requires notification
  • Only clean, sorted, single-polymer plastics qualify for Annex IX (B3011)

E-WASTE IMPACT:

  • Plastic casings and components from e-waste subject to stricter controls
  • Brominated flame retardant-containing plastics likely hazardous
  • Mixed e-waste plastic fractions harder to trade
  • Incentivizes better sorting and separation
  • Reduced markets for contaminated plastic fractions

Future Proposed Changes

MERCURY WASTE THRESHOLDS:

Under Consideration:

  • Specific concentration thresholds for mercury wastes
  • Clarify when mercury content triggers hazardous classification
  • Align with Minamata Convention on Mercury

E-Waste Implications:

  • LCD backlights with mercury face stricter controls
  • Mercury switches and relays
  • Testing requirements for mercury content
  • May accelerate phase-out of mercury-containing e-waste imports

LITHIUM BATTERY SPECIFIC ENTRY:

Discussions Ongoing:

  • Dedicated annex entry for lithium-ion batteries
  • Currently covered under broader e-waste entries
  • Growth in battery waste from EVs, electronics, energy storage
  • Safety concerns driving regulatory attention

Potential Provisions:

  • Separate Y-code for lithium batteries
  • Specific transport and ESM requirements
  • Distinction between batteries in equipment vs. separated batteries
  • Capacity thresholds for classification

CRITICAL MINERALS RECOVERY:

Emerging Issue:

  • Recognition that e-waste contains valuable critical minerals (cobalt, rare earths, etc.)
  • Tension between waste control and resource recovery goals
  • Proposals to facilitate trade for recovery while maintaining ESM

Potential Approaches:

  • Streamlined procedures for high-grade critical mineral-bearing e-waste
  • Quality standards distinguishing "urban mining" feedstock from waste
  • Enhanced ESM requirements for critical mineral recovery
  • Coordination with raw materials policies (EU Critical Raw Materials Act, etc.)

ELECTRONIC NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS:

Trend:

  • Movement toward mandatory electronic notification submission
  • Real-time tracking of transboundary movements
  • Data sharing between competent authorities
  • Integration with customs and logistics systems

Development Status:

  • Some countries already require electronic submission
  • Basel Secretariat developing information exchange platforms
  • May become mandatory globally within 5-10 years
  • Exporters should prepare for digital-first processes

CIRCULAR ECONOMY INTEGRATION:

Discussion Points:

  • Basel as enabler vs. barrier to circular economy
  • Facilitating legitimate resource recovery while preventing illegal traffic
  • Harmonization with circular economy policies (EU, national)
  • Possible new categories for "secondary raw materials"

Potential Changes:

  • Exemptions for certified circular economy supply chains
  • Enhanced ESM standards linked to circular economy principles
  • Product design requirements (design for recycling)
  • Extended producer responsibility coordination

Monitoring Future Developments

OFFICIAL SOURCES:

  • Basel Secretariat website:www.basel.int
  • Conference of Parties meeting reports
  • Open-ended Working Group (OEWG) recommendations
  • Expert Working Group technical guidelines updates
  • National focal point communications

INDUSTRY RESOURCES:

  • Trade associations (ISRI, BMRA, etc.) monitor Basel developments
  • Industry newsletters and alerts
  • Webinars and conferences on Basel updates
  • Consultant advisories

NGO MONITORING:

  • Basel Action Network (BAN)
  • StEP Initiative (Solving the E-Waste Problem)
  • IPEN (International Pollutants Elimination Network)
  • Environmental advocacy groups track and comment on proposals

ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH:

  • Academic papers on Basel implementation and challenges
  • Research on emerging waste streams and management technologies
  • Policy analysis of proposed amendments

STAYING CURRENT:

  • Subscribe to Basel Secretariat newsletter
  • Follow competent authorities in countries where you operate
  • Join industry working groups on Basel issues
  • Review COP meeting outcomes every 2 years
  • Budget for compliance adjustments when amendments adopted
  • Build flexibility into operations to adapt to changes

Preparing for Amendments

ADVANCE PLANNING:

  • Monitor proposals under discussion at OEWG and COP
  • Assess potential impact on your operations
  • Participate in industry comment processes
  • Engage with national delegations to Basel meetings
  • Build relationships with competent authorities to understand their perspectives

OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY:

  • Diversify destinations and material streams
  • Maintain capability to reclassify wastes as codes change
  • Invest in testing and characterization capacity
  • Develop relationships with facilities in multiple jurisdictions
  • Don't over-commit to single market that may change

COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS:

  • Design internal compliance programs adaptable to new requirements
  • Train staff on importance of staying current
  • Regular reviews of procedures against latest Basel provisions
  • Document compliance approach for audit trail
  • Engage qualified consultants for major transitions

BUSINESS STRATEGY:

  • Anticipate tightening restrictions on hazardous waste exports
  • Consider domestic processing investments
  • Explore OECD country partnerships (more stable regulatory environment)
  • Adapt material streams to favor non-hazardous classifications
  • Invest in preprocessing to upgrade material quality

Common Errors

  • Assuming amendments apply immediately upon COP adoption (entry into force may be years later)
  • Not checking which countries have ratified specific amendments
  • Continuing to use deleted codes (B1110, B4030) after 2025
  • Not reclassifying waste streams when amendments change definitions
  • Ignoring proposed amendments until after adoption (missing opportunity to adapt)
  • Assuming all Basel Parties operate under same amendment status
  • Not monitoring non-Basel developments that affect e-waste (EU regulations, OECD, Minamata, etc.)
  • Treating technical guidelines as optional (competent authorities rely on them heavily)
  • Not budgeting for compliance costs when major amendments loom
  • Missing transition periods and grandfathering provisions in amendment implementation

References

Section: Additional Ref · Type: guide